Great Kilt worn as formal attire

[Woodsheal]

The logical extension of David's and MoR's arguments is that the box-pleated, Kingussie-pleated, and other earlier and historic forms of the kilt should not be countenanced with current attire, and we should all limit ourselves to the 8 yd, knife-pleated tank - as that is what is accepted and worn in today's Scottish highlands. (I assume David has sold his box-pleats! )

[M. A. C. Newsome]

The logical extension of David's and MoR's arguments is that the box-pleated, Kingussie-pleated, and other earlier and historic forms of the kilt should not be countenanced with current attire, and we should all limit ourselves to the 8 yd, knife-pleated tank - as that is what is accepted and worn in today's Scottish highlands. (I assume David has sold his box-pleats! )

I think everyone would agree that there are certainly elements of historic (or historic-inspired) dress which are perfectly acceptable, and perhaps even expected, with modern day Highland attire. I'm thinking not only of things such as pleating styles, but also gauntlet cuffs, tashes on doublets, the cut of certain doublet styles such as the Sherrifmuir, buckle brogues, certain sporran styles, bonnet styles, lace jabots, cravats, etc.

I have seen on numerous occasions clan chiefs wearing sporrans that are 200+ years old with modern Highland attire and it not only looks perfectly acceptable, but actually better than many modern day sporrans.

But on the other hand, I think we all can agree that other times wearing items of historic dress with modern Highland attire can lend a certain costumish look to the outfit.

So, how do we know what will work and what will not work? I think it takes a little trial and error, and may also be dependant upon the wearer's personality!