|
-
24th July 13, 07:35 AM
#1
I vote for the one in the middle............what? It's not a poll? Foiled again.
Friends stay in touch on FB simon Taylor-dando
Best regards
Simon
-
The Following 7 Users say 'Aye' to Grizzly For This Useful Post:
-
24th July 13, 08:01 AM
#2
But it is ALSO a fashion garment and as such the fashion side of kilt wearing will cause variations in the appearance and style of the kilt. If a kilt maker decides to 'innovate' his kilt by dropping the pleats it might still be a kilt, whether your opinion says otherwise or not. The same way the model T is still considered a car. If you want to be a traditionalist, wear the traditional garb the traditional way. What happens on the 'fashion' side of kilt wearing shouldn't be of any concern to you since a tradition, by definition, is impervious to fashion trends.
There's also no need for name calling: "skirt wearing hipsters" It doesn't promote positive bonds between members. I'm proud of being a skirt wearing hipster. Now, excuse me while I go find my wayfarers.
-
The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to adempsey10 For This Useful Post:
-
24th July 13, 08:30 AM
#3
If Ford decided to reintroduce the Model T, it could make those alonside the new Mustangs and still be considered an automobile manufacturer. If a kiltmaker decided to...innovate(?) and produce unpleated skirts, he/she would no longer be a kiltmaker. A kilt, by definition, has pleats. I have no problem with some dude wearing a skirt--my only issue would be if he tried insisting it was a kilt. I'd give him a dictionary and a sad shake of my head.
Of course, the fasion world and I are no longer on speaking terms, so I am probably missing the artful, edgy, devastatingly profound nuance.
Mister McGoo
A Kilted Lebowski--Taking it easy so you don't have to.
-
-
24th July 13, 10:34 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by LitTrog
If Ford decided to reintroduce the Model T, it could make those alonside the new Mustangs and still be considered an automobile manufacturer. If a kiltmaker decided to...innovate(?) and produce unpleated skirts, he/she would no longer be a kiltmaker. A kilt, by definition, has pleats. I have no problem with some dude wearing a skirt--my only issue would be if he tried insisting it was a kilt. I'd give him a dictionary and a sad shake of my head.
Yup! This..spot on, LitTrog.
The Official [BREN]
-
-
24th July 13, 09:46 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by adempsey10
But it is ALSO a fashion garment and as such the fashion side of kilt wearing will cause variations in the appearance and style of the kilt. If a kilt maker decides to 'innovate' his kilt by dropping the pleats it might still be a kilt, whether your opinion says otherwise or not. The same way the model T is still considered a car. If you want to be a traditionalist, wear the traditional garb the traditional way. What happens on the 'fashion' side of kilt wearing shouldn't be of any concern to you since a tradition, by definition, is impervious to fashion trends.
There's also no need for name calling: "skirt wearing hipsters" It doesn't promote positive bonds between members. I'm proud of being a skirt wearing hipster. Now, excuse me while I go find my wayfarers.
Nope that was a Model T without wheels and you cannot seperate all historical bonds of a garment because history and evolution are insaperable, so the anything-goes-fashion-excuse is a bit akward. Evolution means something grows and contemporary kilts are kilts by definition and accepted as such. A kilt without pleats is not a kilt in the same way a Model T is not a car without wheels. You can delute your coffee all you want but someone has to drink it. In fact, you can call a skirt all you want, throw history overboard for being so called "fashionable" but if it has no impact on the evolution of a garment, no one buys into it. ;)
I'd say there is no need for whining over nothing, cause you are a man and not a mouse. I was refering to the anything-goes skirt wearer on another forum.
I don't want to be a traditionalist, I just cannot wait for the day someone calls a pair of jeans a kilt.
-
-
24th July 13, 04:46 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by cryptoman
... I don't want to be a traditionalist, I just cannot wait for the day someone calls a pair of jeans a kilt. 
Of course thanks to challenges to kilt makers you can indeed now get a kilt made from several pairs old jeans, although you can see that I prefer the more traditional look they are both "kilts", I agree that getting rid of the pleats rather destroys any reasonable definition of what a kilt might be ...
-
-
27th July 13, 06:56 AM
#7
Paul Henry kilt .... Made from jeans, saw it, looked good.
kilts have evolved through fashion materials, fastenings etc. evolution is what got us here
Last edited by Stoo; 27th July 13 at 06:58 AM.
-
-
27th July 13, 08:09 AM
#8
All kilts may be skirts but not all skirts are kilts. Gotta have rear pleats.
Last edited by Bohica; 27th July 13 at 08:11 AM.
I'll not be lied to , stolen from or laid a hand upon. I do this to no man and I require the same in return.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks