-
 Originally Posted by CMcG
Interesting! figheadair, could you give us some details on the MacQuarrie tartan being dated to mid-18th century? The references in the Scottish Register of Tartans don't seem to go back further than early 19th.
Both the Cockburn (1810) and Highland Society of London (1816) collections contain samples of MacQuarrie, not those generally worn today, that are pieces typical of rural woven cloth rather than Wilsons' material which makes up the majority of both collections. The patterns differ but in both cases the rustic specimens are woven with hand-spun singles (non-plied yarn) and have herringbone selvedges. The material and setting in both specimens is consistent with Highland cloth of the mid-18th century hence their inclusion in my list. Here's the HSL specimen.
-
The Following 4 Users say 'Aye' to figheadair For This Useful Post:
-
 Originally Posted by figheadair
Both the Cockburn (1810) and Highland Society of London (1816) collections contain samples of MacQuarrie, not those generally worn today, that are pieces typical of rural woven cloth rather than Wilsons' material which makes up the majority of both collections. The patterns differ but in both cases the rustic specimens are woven with hand-spun singles (non-plied yarn) and have herringbone selvedges. The material and setting in both specimens is consistent with Highland cloth of the mid-18th century hence their inclusion in my list. Here's the HSL specimen.

That's some deep tartan knowledge. After looking up those sources it appears that in the early 1800s, the Highland Society of London (of which Cockburn was a member), actually went to the clan chiefs and asked what their tartan was. The last chief of the Clan MacQuarrie died in 1818 and, the chiefdom having been vacant for nearly 200 years, this is an important historical point for clansmen. The most commonly seen MacQuarrie tartan is actually quite different from the one authorized by the last chief.
- Justitia et fortitudo invincibilia sunt
- An t'arm breac dearg
-
-
 Originally Posted by CMcG
That's some deep tartan knowledge. After looking up those sources it appears that in the early 1800s, the Highland Society of London (of which Cockburn was a member), actually went to the clan chiefs and asked what their tartan was. The last chief of the Clan MacQuarrie died in 1818 and, the chiefdom having been vacant for nearly 200 years, this is an important historical point for clansmen. The most commonly seen MacQuarrie tartan is actually quite different from the one authorized by the last chief.
Gen. David Stewart of Garth was the driver to gather the Society's tartan collection. He was taken by the idea of clan tartans even though he and the majority of chiefs had no idea of what they wore in the 18th century. As a result, many chiefs went to Wilsons to ask them what they should be wearing. Wilsons' comments on a number of tartans supports the recent adoption of tartans by particular clans. The MacQuarrie sample is one of a very small number that were gathered in the Highlands rather than supplied by a commercial weaving firm..
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to figheadair For This Useful Post:
-
This thread peaked my interest in the Colquhoun tartan. I found this site: http://www.helensburgh-heritage.co.u...ons&Itemid=461
I don't see any mention of a surviving swatch but the story was compelling enough to post.
-
-
 Originally Posted by Tarheel
An interesting article. I know the author; we agree on some things but not others; I'm driven by evidence. This is the key phrase ". The pattern was listed with Wilsons as “superfine” and was therefore likely to have been regarded as a clan tartan prior to the end of the eighteenth century."
Superfine was a quality of cloth woven by Wilsons of Bannockburn c1800-40. Wilsons gave no evidence to support the idea that they regarded thks a clan tartan. The author of the article believes that there clan tartans in the mid-18th century; an idea I fundanemtally disagree with. There is no evidence for the Colquhoun tartan before c1800.
Last edited by figheadair; 5th July 15 at 10:09 AM.
-
-
Knowing my family and their ability to meld into circumstances that will support the survival of the whole, I agree there may not have been a singular or defining tartan to bind many versatile groups under one banner or Laird. Without the evidence of cloth or portraits, I agree with the speculation on the longevity of an official tartan of the Clan. Yet the Colquhoun survive and are proud of our heritage. Thanks for your opinion and observations figheadair.
-
-
Is there a summarised collection of this information somewhere? Like a website or book.
Info like weight of cloth, surviving pieces, differences in weights of tartan used for different garments, preferred colours?
-
-
- Justitia et fortitudo invincibilia sunt
- An t'arm breac dearg
-
-
-
-
Interesting paintings. I'm particularly struck by "The Champion"'s weapon. It appears to be a strange cross between a broadsword and a cavalry saber. I'm sure that a frugal and adaptive people like the highlanders would be able to find a use for a 'misplaced' saber, but it's not the first think that comes to mind.
I wonder if this was a bit of dramatic license on the part of the artist? If so, might not the tartan also be fancified?
'A damned ill-conditioned sort of an ape. It had a can of ale at every pot-house on the road, and is reeling drunk. "
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks