An Early Highland Revival Coat

[Luke MacGillie]

Im happy to see that this was written up. Did you happen to get a coat pattern from the Owner as well?

[Lady Grey]

Great Article.
I'm just wondering if you got any information about, thread, stitches used, internal facings, understructure, etc, etc?
Or was the Tartan the main area of study?

Lovely to see.

[Orvis]

Peter - Great article as usual! As you mentioned, the amount of red in the sett probably indicates that the coat/waistcoat were made for a well-to-do person. From the photos, it appears to me that the style of 1780's-1790's coat wasn't that different from the 1740's Culloden coat that you once wrote about. This coat has longer tails and a collar, but otherwise appears the same in cut and methodology. IMHO, it was obviously made by a town tailor.

I look forward to reading more of your work in the future!

Gerry

[figheadair]

Im happy to see that this was written up. Did you happen to get a coat pattern from the Owner as well?

No, I don't think the pattern has ever been copied. No doubt someone could do if they happened to live reasonably close. The coat is in MA.

Great Article.
I'm just wondering if you got any information about, thread, stitches used, internal facings, understructure, etc, etc?
Or was the Tartan the main area of study?

The tartan was my principal area of interest, that and identifying the owner if possible. As the coat is undamaged there is no detail of the understructure. The seam strictching is hidden inside but I do have overview pictures of the inside of the coat and waistcoat, plus some close-ups of some of the stitching where the sleeve joins the main lining and the outsite of the pockets. Were it is visible the stitching appears to be either a simple running stictch or in the case of the internal sleeves, whip stitching.

Peter - Great article as usual! As you mentioned, the amount of red in the sett probably indicates that the coat/waistcoat were made for a well-to-do person. From the photos, it appears to me that the style of 1780's-1790's coat wasn't that different from the 1740's Culloden coat that you once wrote about. This coat has longer tails and a collar, but otherwise appears the same in cut and methodology. IMHO, it was obviously made by a town tailor.
Gerry

Gerry, comparing the this coat with the Culloden era ones there are a numer of obvious differences beyond the length of the tails:

Culloden Coat - small stand-up collar, epaulettes, no pockets, typical mid-C18th military cuffs (called Crail style in modern Highland dress).

HR Coat - large fold-over collar, no epaulettes, two large hip pockets, typical civilian two button cuff.

I agree that the HR Coat would have been made by a town tailor, most likely, Edinburgh but Glasgow or one of the other larger cities could also have been the source.

[MacKenzie]

Great article, Peter. Thank you for posting.