-
12th September 22, 11:35 PM
#1
This is interesting to see.
He and the other Royal men had been in morning-coat previously, going into uniform as protocol and ceremony demanded.
I wonder what made The Princess Royal opt for trousers with her naval uniform, rather than a skirt.
-
-
13th September 22, 12:42 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by Troglodyte
This is interesting to see.
He and the other Royal men had been in morning-coat previously, going into uniform as protocol and ceremony demanded
The King was in the uniform of a Field Marshal for the earlier walk behind the coffin and serve in St.Giles. He then changed into TCHD when he went to the Scottish Parliament. His decision to retain the kilt for the Vigil would not have been made lightly.
I wonder what made The Princess Royal opt for trousers with her naval uniform, rather than a skirt.
Dress Regs now allow females the option of trousers. Additionally, I'm not sure there is protocol for an Admiral to wear a skirt and sword in No.1 Dress.
Last edited by figheadair; 13th September 22 at 07:14 AM.
-
The Following 6 Users say 'Aye' to figheadair For This Useful Post:
-
15th September 22, 01:45 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by figheadair
———————————-
Dress Regs now allow females the option of trousers. Additionally, I'm not sure there is protocol for an Admiral to wear a skirt and sword in No.1 Dress.
My father, RN retired, used to have a habit of reminding us youngsters when in his opinion we had done something not quite right. “There is the right way to do things and there is a wrong way of doing things and then, there is the Royal Navy’s way of doing things.” It left us with very little room to manoeuvre on the excuses front!
Interestingly and baring this conversation in mind, I noted that when The Late Queen’s coffin was flown in to Northolt the other evening, the RAF were there to do the honours and two of the female RAF Officers in the Reception Party were wearing skirts and were carrying swords. Perhaps, the RAF have their way of doing things too?
Last edited by Jock Scot; 15th September 22 at 03:15 AM.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
-
15th September 22, 10:41 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
Interestingly and baring this conversation in mind, I noted that when The Late Queen’s coffin was flown in to Northolt the other evening, the RAF were there to do the honours and two of the female RAF Officers in the Reception Party were wearing skirts and were carrying swords. Perhaps, the RAF have their way of doing things too?
There is a choice across all three Services. I wonder if the length of the walk on both occasions might have been a factor.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to figheadair For This Useful Post:
-
15th September 22, 01:52 PM
#5
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
My father, RN retired, used to have a habit of reminding us youngsters when in his opinion we had done something not quite right. “There is the right way to do things and there is a wrong way of doing things and then, there is the Royal Navy’s way of doing things.” It left us with very little room to manoeuvre on the excuses front!
Interestingly and baring this conversation in mind, I noted that when The Late Queen’s coffin was flown in to Northolt the other evening, the RAF were there to do the honours and two of the female RAF Officers in the Reception Party were wearing skirts and were carrying swords. Perhaps, the RAF have their way of doing things too?
The RAF company of about 200 that greeted Her Majesty on the runway at Northolt had impeccable, absolutely perfect drill. You would expect them to be good but as far as I could see, they were flawless.
Those ancient U Nialls from Donegal were a randy bunch.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Ninehostages For This Useful Post:
-
16th September 22, 04:39 AM
#6
 Originally Posted by Ninehostages
The RAF company of about 200 that greeted Her Majesty on the runway at Northolt had impeccable, absolutely perfect drill. You would expect them to be good but as far as I could see, they were flawless.
I too was very impressed.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
-
16th September 22, 01:34 PM
#7
There seems some controversy about Prince Andrew wearing military uniform because of his unfortunate association with an American paedophile whereas Prince Harry who served in the firces is seemingly not allowed due to his rejection of royalty in favour of his American wife. You couldn’t really make it up could you?
-
-
16th September 22, 02:24 PM
#8
 Originally Posted by Ivor
There seems some controversy about Prince Andrew wearing military uniform because of his unfortunate association with an American paedophile whereas Prince Harry who served in the firces is seemingly not allowed due to his rejection of royalty in favour of his American wife. You couldn’t really make it up could you?
At the King's request Prince Harry will be in uniform for the the second family vigil.
https://people.com/royals/prince-har...arles-request/
-
-
16th September 22, 11:19 PM
#9
 Originally Posted by Ivor
There seems some controversy about Prince Andrew wearing military uniform because of his unfortunate association with an American paedophile whereas Prince Harry who served in the firces is seemingly not allowed due to his rejection of royalty in favour of his American wife. You couldn’t really make it up could you?
Prince Andrew was allowed to wear uniform for the Vigil of the Princes. Similarly, Prince Harry will wear uniform today when the Queen's eight grandchildren mount the Vigil. Princess Anne worn the ceremonial uniform of the Blues and Royals, a cavalry regiment, part of the Household Cavalry Regiment of which the Princess Royal is The Colonel of the Regiment.
Last edited by figheadair; 16th September 22 at 11:35 PM.
-
-
17th September 22, 02:04 AM
#10
 Originally Posted by Ivor
There seems some controversy about Prince Andrew wearing military uniform because of his unfortunate association with an American paedophile whereas Prince Harry who served in the firces is seemingly not allowed due to his rejection of royalty in favour of his American wife. You couldn’t really make it up could you?
There is rather more to these stories than you describe. But, I think this is not the place, or time, to discuss it.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following 17 Users say 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
Arnot,DCampbell16B,EagleJCS,Father Bill,figheadair,Iain Ruaidh,kilted redleg,kingandrew,Liam,Nathan,neloon,OC Richard,plaid preacher,planemaker,pofloyd1,ThistleDown,tripleblessed
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks