-
16th April 07, 07:17 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by Braveheart88
D'oh, I just saw this comment. Then how come all the scots were wearing them in Braveheart, set in the 14th Century?
Hollywood decided that the Kilt and Woad are what make people Scottish. They pulled the kilt from the future, and Woad from the Picts of the distant past. EVEN if highlanders at the time were wearing kilts. (I Believe) William Wallace was a lowlander. Lowlanders did not start wearing kilts until the Act of Union, as a protest against being united with England.
-
-
16th April 07, 08:13 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by jordanjm
Hollywood decided that the Kilt and Woad are what make people Scottish.  They pulled the kilt from the future, and Woad from the Picts of the distant past. EVEN if highlanders at the time were wearing kilts. (I Believe) William Wallace was a lowlander. Lowlanders did not start wearing kilts until the Act of Union, as a protest against being united with England.
What about the painting I linked too? Inspired by the movie? Just curious, don't want to seem confrontational
-
-
16th April 07, 08:18 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Braveheart88
What about the painting I linked too? Inspired by the movie? Just curious, don't want to seem confrontational 
Or inspired by someone's overactive imagination! 
Visit www.albanach.org or http://medievalscotland.org/.
T.
-
-
16th April 07, 01:22 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by jordanjm
Hollywood decided that the Kilt and Woad are what make people Scottish.  They pulled the kilt from the future, and Woad from the Picts of the distant past. EVEN if highlanders at the time were wearing kilts. (I Believe) William Wallace was a lowlander. Lowlanders did not start wearing kilts until the Act of Union, as a protest against being united with England.
Yes, you are correct that Wallace was a lowlander, but lowlanders did not start wearing kilts in any numbers until well after the Act of Union, not until the tartan vogue of the early 19th century.
-
-
16th April 07, 01:52 PM
#5
The Battle of Stirling Bridge.......minus the bridge. Weird.
-
-
16th April 07, 02:08 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by bubba
The Battle of Stirling Bridge.......minus the bridge. Weird.
Stranger things happened, such as his impregnating Isabelle of France when she was a child, and had not yet even left France for England, or married the future Edward II. She was only 13 years old when Wallace died.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Dreadbelly in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 5
Last Post: 7th January 07, 03:08 PM
-
By NewKilt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 6
Last Post: 11th May 06, 09:10 PM
-
By Niblox in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 11
Last Post: 6th January 06, 11:29 PM
-
By davedove in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 42
Last Post: 1st September 05, 06:57 AM
-
By Jim H. in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 18
Last Post: 12th August 05, 04:19 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks