-
30th April 07, 11:16 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by Mark Keney
We as kilties don't always help matters. How many times have you seen pics of wedding parties lifting their own kilts. We (some of us) encourage the mystique of what is worn under the kilt for the attention it gives us.
Please correct me if I'm off-base, but I'd like to see if I can turn this around:
I would say that this is like saying, "Because I've seen SOME people who wear PANTS who also "moon" in public (drop their pants to show their buttocks), I should be able to ask ANYONE who wears pants as to their underwear preferences."
Somehow, when I change the words, it doesn't make as strong an argument.
However, I do agree with Mark. I believe that the problem with voluntary kilt-lifting at weddings may be due to the fact that the majority of these people are not full- or part-time kilt-wearers, and are wearing the kilt for one day of their life for the purpose of the wedding, and therefore, do not respect it as a normal manner of dress and instead view it as a costume.
-
-
30th April 07, 11:20 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by KiltedBill
However, I do agree with Mark. I believe that the problem with voluntary kilt-lifting at weddings may be due to the fact that the majority of these people are not full- or part-time kilt-wearers, and are wearing the kilt for one day of their life for the purpose of the wedding, and therefore, do not respect it as a normal manner of dress and instead view it as a costume.
Add massive consumption of alcoholic beverages to the above set of conditions and you are FER SURE lookin' at some "comedians" making asses of themselves.
Best
AA
-
-
30th April 07, 01:08 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by KiltedBill
However, I do agree with Mark. I believe that the problem with voluntary kilt-lifting at weddings may be due to the fact that the majority of these people are not full- or part-time kilt-wearers, and are wearing the kilt for one day of their life for the purpose of the wedding, and therefore, do not respect it as a normal manner of dress and instead view it as a costume.
One comes across many such wedding clips on the net and many such people do not see the need to be any different in their choice of underwear to what they would wear under trousered circumstances
But there still remains a major difference between voluntary visual demonstration (questions of taste excluded) and involuntary tactile exploration.
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
Similar Threads
-
By RK-REX in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 33
Last Post: 24th February 07, 05:02 PM
-
By Riverkilt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 25
Last Post: 23rd February 07, 10:47 AM
-
By Captain in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 23
Last Post: 18th December 06, 01:19 PM
-
By beloitpiper in forum Kilt Board Newbie
Replies: 23
Last Post: 5th July 06, 02:35 PM
-
By Big Paul in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 22
Last Post: 15th March 05, 07:16 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks