X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 72

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    21st May 07
    Location
    North Hollywood/Sun Valley, California
    Posts
    1,253
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I remember reading somewhere many years ago that it was for pracitical purposes during battles in those days;
    One wouldn;t be 'Caught with one's pants down" so to speak, during a surprise attack, when answering nature's call. Plus in crossing often waist deep streams etc. one simply hoisted up the kilt. No wet trousers or underwear to worry about afterward.
    Today, wear underneath what is comfortable and appropriate to you. It isn't a fancy dress costume. (I never wear Flashes-why should I? they are just 'dressing up' stuff).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    8th June 04
    Location
    Port Crane, New York
    Posts
    2,531
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozman1944 View Post
    I remember reading somewhere many years ago that it was for pracitical purposes during battles in those days;
    One wouldn;t be 'Caught with one's pants down" so to speak, during a surprise attack, when answering nature's call. Plus in crossing often waist deep streams etc. one simply hoisted up the kilt. No wet trousers or underwear to worry about afterward.
    I wouldn't say that there was ever a conscious decision on the part of Highlanders along the lines of, "We're not going to wear underwear!" And the reason is (speaking about the 'historic" period now, pre-1800) Highlanders WERE actually using the same underwear as European men elsewhere, that being long shirt tails. Separate drawers came later.
    The underwear of that period for trouser and britches wearers - as well as the kilted - was your shirt tails tucked between your legs. Some even had buttons to facilitate this practice (shirt tails were knee length in those days).
    So, later when underwear/drawers evolved as a separate garment (early 1800's), the backwards Highlanders simply clung to their old practice of their shirt tails being their only undergarment....
    Brian

    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~ Benjamin Franklin

  3. #3
    Join Date
    16th May 07
    Location
    Nashua, NH
    Posts
    630
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Woodsheal View Post
    I wouldn't say that there was ever a conscious decision on the part of Highlanders along the lines of, "We're not going to wear underwear!" And the reason is (speaking about the 'historic" period now, pre-1800) Highlanders WERE actually using the same underwear as European men elsewhere, that being long shirt tails. Separate drawers came later.
    The underwear of that period for trouser and britches wearers - as well as the kilted - was your shirt tails tucked between your legs. Some even had buttons to facilitate this practice (shirt tails were knee length in those days).
    So, later when underwear/drawers evolved as a separate garment (early 1800's), the backwards Highlanders simply clung to their old practice of their shirt tails being their only undergarment....
    I was actually considering putting buttons or velcro or something on my shirt tails so I could do them up like a baby's 'onesie'. This would have the dual benefit of concealing the merchandise and keeping my shirt tucked in.
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
    Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0