X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
7th January 08, 08:12 AM
#1
I've always been curious about something. A woman will spend un-Godly amounts of money on her wedding gown. A gown she'll wear once in her life. Yet it is expected, and often demanded, that a groom must rent his wedding attire. A formal suit of clothes that could serve well for formal events for years to come.
My suggestion, you should own your wedding attire. But nothing says that, if you purchase, your wedding party has to purchase as well. Arrange hires if they don't wish to own. Who knows, if your groomsmen hire their turn-out, the shop might offer a kick-back on the purchase of yours.
ETA: Something else. Is their a hard-and-fast rule that says if the groom is kilted, then the rest of the men in the wedding party must be kilted as well? After all, shouldn't the bride and groom be the center of attention at the wedding?
-
Similar Threads
-
By M. A. C. Newsome in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 24
Last Post: 12th October 07, 11:30 AM
-
By RockyR in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 21
Last Post: 4th May 07, 01:13 PM
-
By jiminak in forum Comments and Suggestions
Replies: 5
Last Post: 28th November 06, 04:57 PM
-
By Derek in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 17
Last Post: 15th July 06, 02:20 PM
-
By Raphael in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 1
Last Post: 4th April 04, 07:46 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks