-
27th January 08, 05:48 AM
#1
Heraldically speaking, when you wear your chief's badge, you are showing your loyalty to the cheif. At the heart of it, this is what it means to be a member of the clan. Are you loyal to your clan cheif? Even if one could not prove through geneaology that they were related to the clan, if you were loyal to the cheif, you'd most likely be considered a member.
-
-
27th January 08, 07:37 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
Heraldically speaking, when you wear your chief's badge, you are showing your loyalty to the cheif. At the heart of it, this is what it means to be a member of the clan. Are you loyal to your clan cheif? Even if one could not prove through geneaology that they were related to the clan, if you were loyal to the cheif, you'd most likely be considered a member.
I know what you are referring to here as the 'Chiefs Badge' (Clansmans Badge, Chiefs Crest in a Strap & Buckle) however the 'Chiefs Badge' may well be different to his crest the 'Plant Badge' for example. No Clans person can wear the 'Chiefs Badge' only the Chief's crest in a strap & buckle. The 'Chiefs Cap Badge' again this is different to the Clansman's Cap Badge.
-
-
27th January 08, 08:11 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
Heraldically speaking, when you wear your chief's badge, you are showing your loyalty to the cheif. At the heart of it, this is what it means to be a member of the clan. Are you loyal to your clan cheif? Even if one could not prove through geneaology that they were related to the clan, if you were loyal to the cheif, you'd most likely be considered a member.
Even with those requirements, there's not really a Scottish clan I can claim. I do have some Scottish ancestors.
The only "clan" to which I have sworn loyalty is the US Army.
And as Steve said, I a member of this great internet clan.
We're fools whether we dance or not, so we might as well dance. - Japanese Proverb
-
-
27th January 08, 08:22 AM
#4
Dave, you can join any clan you wish, you don't have to be a so called 'sept' or of the name of that clan or any blood ties what so ever. If they accept you as a member of the Clan/Clan Society then you are a member.
That's how its been for generations don't be drawn into Skene's Victorian romanticism of 'septs' and/or being of the name or family.
To quote Sir Thomas Innes of Learney, GCVO WS (1893-1971) Lord Lyon King of Arms, 1945-1969, after being Carrick Pursuivant and Albany Herald in the 1930’s makes mention in the book Clan Septs and Regiments of the Scottish Highlands 1952 co-authored by Frank Adam that; “septs must be regarded as a rather wonderful effort of imagination” and “The very word ‘sept’ is delusive and no serious attention can now be attached to Skene’s theories about ‘septs”. He also states that some Clan historians could be being found guilty of “sept-snatching”.
"So sometimes sept families are related to the clan chief and his family, but, more likely, they would not be."
Last edited by Sketraw; 27th January 08 at 08:29 AM.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Rufus in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 49
Last Post: 4th January 09, 08:12 PM
-
By Colquhoun in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 28
Last Post: 15th August 08, 03:59 AM
-
By morpth in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 21
Last Post: 28th January 07, 02:12 PM
-
By macsim in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 10
Last Post: 24th November 06, 08:58 AM
-
By Ranald in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 31
Last Post: 12th September 05, 12:55 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks