-
4th February 08, 11:45 AM
#1
Ok, I'll buy that for looks the third belt/buckle may be something that you might like because it's "traditional", but other than looks, why would you ever want one?
There are two big minuses for me. 1, it's just something else to catch on something, and 2, doesn't it defeat the purpose of that nice big deep pleat?
As I understand it, the deep pleat helps in movement (and maybe even in modesty when you sit) but what the point of having it, if you're going to restrict its movement with a belt?
It don't mean a thing, if you aint got that swing!!
'S Rioghal Mo Dhream - a child of the mist
-
-
4th February 08, 01:36 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by Kid Cossack
Well, since you asked, I prefer two straps. Actually, I also prefer that the left hip strap be set up like Matt Newsome does his---with the buckle INSIDE and no hole cut through the material. YMMV.
For traditional kilts, the belt hole is not cut in the material, but is actually between two pleats. The pleats are just not sewn by the belt hole.
 Originally Posted by JimB
As I understand it, the deep pleat helps in movement (and maybe even in modesty when you sit) but what the point of having it, if you're going to restrict its movement with a belt?
The deep pleat is traditionally sewn from the fell to the top of the kilt. Therefore, haveing the extra belt and buckle do not add or subtract from the functionality of the deep pleat.
The engineer in me says that the only thing the extra buckle does is reduce the amount the front apron can move relative to the under apron. With a one belt kilt the front apron will pivot around the waist belt. With two belts, the front apron will pivot around the hip belt. So the cosined of the angle will be less for the two belt kilt (amount of travel at the selvage).
Wallace Catanach, Kiltmaker
A day without killting is like a day without sunshine.
-
-
4th February 08, 02:01 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by ChattanCat
The deep pleat is traditionally sewn from the fell to the top of the kilt. Therefore, haveing the extra belt and buckle do not add or subtract from the functionality of the deep pleat.
You're right of course. Not doing belts on my kilts I had a hard time visualising it. It would in fact hinder the movement of the upper apron with the under apron which would in effect tend to cinch the kilt across that area unnaturally. Other than "tradition" or maybe just liking that look, I just don't get it.
Personally, I think the only reason Scots designed kilts with belts in the first place is that they didn't know about Velcro!
It don't mean a thing, if you aint got that swing!!
'S Rioghal Mo Dhream - a child of the mist
-
Similar Threads
-
By Galant in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 44
Last Post: 27th February 09, 09:46 AM
-
By SnakeEyes in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 134
Last Post: 31st January 07, 04:51 PM
-
By Robin in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 10
Last Post: 12th September 06, 03:55 PM
-
By Robin in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 16
Last Post: 21st November 05, 08:56 AM
-
By Riverkilt in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 23
Last Post: 27th September 05, 07:25 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks