-
29th February 08, 11:27 AM
#1
From another current XMTS thread 'Hands Aff Oor Kilts!', they mention an article by The Independent titled "Hands off our kilts: Scots bid to copyright their national dress". Yet, at the end of the article, it states:
"Traditionalists insist that the plural of kilt is also kilt, rather than kilts."
I am with Phil (and most of the other posters here so far). To my ear, saying "I own three kilt" does not sound quite right.
Michael the Farlander
Loch Sloy!
-
-
1st March 08, 05:23 AM
#2
I am somewhat perplexed by this thread. There is a plural for both kilt and beer; that is, kilts and beers.
1. I am wearing a kilt.
2. I own three kilts.
1. I will have a beer.
2. I have had three beers.
-
-
25th October 08, 04:20 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Scotus
I am somewhat perplexed by this thread.  There is a plural for both kilt and beer; that is, kilts and beers.
1. I am wearing a kilt.
2. I own three kilts.
1. I will have a beer.
2. I have had three beers.
1. I own a sheep.
2. I own three sheeps.
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Simply adding an "s" to form the plural is incorrect in many cases.
Technically, the word 'kilt' is both singular and plural, or it was when I was taught English.
Mark
Tetley
The Traveller
What a wonderful world it is that has girls in it. - Lazarus Long
-
-
25th October 08, 04:22 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by Farlander
From another current XMTS thread 'Hands Aff Oor Kilts!', they mention an article by The Independent titled "Hands off our kilts: Scots bid to copyright their national dress". Yet, at the end of the article, it states:
"Traditionalists insist that the plural of kilt is also kilt, rather than kilts."
I am with Phil (and most of the other posters here so far). To my ear, saying "I own three kilt" does not sound quite right.
However, it does sound right to me and many others. Just because it sounds does not make it wrong.
Tetley
The Traveller
What a wonderful world it is that has girls in it. - Lazarus Long
-
-
25th October 08, 04:36 AM
#5
Sheep and Fish are rare exceptions to the plural rule and indeed in the case of Fish using the plural Fishes is also acceptable. There are other plurals which are different to the singular like Goose and Geese.
No matter what anyone says Kilt used as a plural sounds just plain wrong. oop:
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
-
25th October 08, 04:51 AM
#6
 Originally Posted by McClef
No matter what anyone says Kilt used as a plural sounds just plain wrong.  oop:
Not to everyone.
Tetley
The Traveller
What a wonderful world it is that has girls in it. - Lazarus Long
-
Similar Threads
-
By Randy in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 7
Last Post: 11th October 07, 05:29 PM
-
By yoippari in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 26
Last Post: 1st June 07, 01:51 PM
-
By StoneCold in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 11
Last Post: 9th October 06, 11:37 AM
-
By Hamish in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 6
Last Post: 17th June 05, 04:40 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks