Quote Originally Posted by cajunscot View Post
Well...not quite. Arms which are inherited are usually differenced, i.e. with certain symbols called labels that denote the first, second, third, etc. son known as cadency. Each son traditionally has its own label; for example, in English arms, the second son's arms bears a crescent moon, the sixth a fleur-de-lis, etc. So it's not quite the same as the bogus concept of family arms, but I can see where you draw the connection. Scottish heraldry also has a system of Cadency; our own Sketraw is a perfect example:

http://www.clan-duncan.co.uk/duncan-arms.html

In English heraldry, the cadency labels are used; all you have to do is look at Prince William and Harry's arms to see an example of this system.

Regards,

Todd
Todd,

I think you'll find that the present trend (for the last several hundred years) outside of Scotland, is against cadency marks, with the exception of the Royals, who are often given a completely differenced coat. Otherwise, things become an impenetrable thicket of cadency marks. The Scottish system, of course, is designed to make things easier by using bordures.