X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
5th December 08, 02:38 PM
#1
It brings up another useful point, clans were blood and by joining by marriage, if the paper trail shows it going back, even with the NPE in play, that child was still part of the clan, even if not by blood, and carries on downward.
-
-
5th December 08, 04:34 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by sathor
It brings up another useful point, clans were blood and by joining by marriage, if the paper trail shows it going back, even with the NPE in play, that child was still part of the clan, even if not by blood, and carries on downward.
Not only that, but other people who were not blood often became part of a clan. In Scotland this gave us many of the septs, i.e. other names that are considered part of a clan, and in Ireland I have been told that they took the clan name as their new surname instead.
Not that any of this is new information for most people here, but I think a lot of the interest in genealogy here stems from looking for clans in the family tree. I think you can claim to be part of a clan either through adoption or through blood, so perhaps those who are adopted have twice the opportunities to claim a clan.
It also means that if you have the name but not the right DNA you may belong to an entire family that was adopted by the clan, rather than having an ancestor who was adopted by step parents or whose father was misattributed.
-
Similar Threads
-
By David Thornton in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 13
Last Post: 13th March 06, 06:39 AM
-
By Iolaus in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 13
Last Post: 29th March 05, 06:45 AM
-
By Atticus in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 16
Last Post: 21st March 05, 11:14 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks