traditional vs. classic

[Jock Scot]

Well, honestly, if one's main concern is modern efficient means of protecting from the elements, maybe the kilt itself isn't the best choice either.

But I think most people would agree there's some level of compromise between functionality and tradition. I love the traditional look of a shoulder plaid when worn wrapped around the chest (as in many of the portraits from the 1800s). But I agree it would be a bit of a bother to wear... and more so if only draped over the shoulder like a folded blanket.

The "borderline costume situation" aspect is quite a conundrum. I suppose some people could pull it off, looking marvelously traditional and like they were born to wear it. Others might look like they're wearing a costume. The difference between the two is hard to define.

Actually in some circumstances I would back, above all else, a heavy wool traditional kilt to protect me from the elements any day.

[Highlander31]

Actually in some circumstances I would back, above all else, a heavy wool traditional kilt to protect me from the elements any day.

I agree with Jock. Where we live on the coast, we have cold driving rain that that can find its way through most clothing. I walk the hillside trails pretty much every morning. My kilt with a woolly pully keeps me warmer than trousers and long johns would.

I have posted the photo below before, however,it is a good example of our weather. It was taken moments before a squall line moved on shore.