-
12th September 07, 11:31 AM
#1
I Joined my clan society
I joined my clan society at the Fergus Highland games earlier on this year, today I received my certificate and membership information, if you are interested in your family history I would say the first step to a larger world would be to join your clan society. Here is the certificate sent to me:
Last edited by McMurdo; 12th September 07 at 01:23 PM.
Reason: grammatic error
-
-
12th September 07, 11:39 AM
#2
Glen,
Congratulations on taking steps to further investigate your heritage. I hope the society is an active one I am sure you will be a good contributing member.
One thing though, you were already a member of Clan Graham by birth. You didn't need to join it as your ancestors were Grahams, therefore by blood you are a Graham. You have joined the Clan Graham Society which is a group of proud members of the Graham Clan who wish to celebrate and promote your shared heritage and the ties between clan.
Cheers
Jamie
-See it there, a white plume
Over the battle - A diamond in the ash
Of the ultimate combustion-My panache
Edmond Rostand
-
-
12th September 07, 11:50 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Panache
One thing though, you were already a member of Clan Graham by birth. You didn't need to join it as your ancestors were Grahams, therefore by blood you are a Graham. You have joined the Clan Graham Society which is a group of proud members of the Graham Clan who wish to celebrate and promote your shared heritage and the ties between clan.
Cheers
Jamie
Actually this is one of my pet peeves. 
Now I'm sure that Glen always understood the difference. It's just my hope that people aren't being misled into thinking that they need to be a paying member of a Clan Society to be a member of the clan. And it's for that reason that I insist on making things clear, like Jamie has done.
Oh, and Congrats on the membership! I'm still patiently to receive my certificate from the Clan Grant Society of Canada, and I applied in June. At least they haven't cashed my cheque yet.
William Grant
Stand Fast Craigellachie!
-
-
12th September 07, 12:06 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by Panache
Glen,
One thing though, you were already a member of Clan Graham by birth. You didn't need to join it as your ancestors were Grahams, therefore by blood you are a Graham. You have joined the Clan Graham Society which is a group of proud members of the Graham Clan who wish to celebrate and promote your shared heritage and the ties between clan.
Cheers
Jamie
Which is exactly why I joined the Clan MacRae Society. I hope you get as much enjoyment out of your membership as I get out of mine. I have met some great people and had some great times.
Brian
In a democracy it's your vote that counts; in feudalism, it's your Count that votes.
-
-
12th September 07, 11:44 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by McMurdo
...if you are interested in your family history I would say the first step to a larger world would be to join your clan society.
You would be very much mistaken.
There is much misinformation in many of the lists of septs and families that are claimed to be associated with the various clans. These bogus lists are perpetrated by tartan merchants who want to sell as much of their product to as many people as possible, and by clan associations who want to attract as many members as possible. Some common names appear on several of these lists.
The first step in tracing your family's history is going to the oldest people in your family and asking them what they remember about their parents, grandparents, and other ancestors. Then one goes to the public records to verify and flesh out these stories, ALWAYS working backward one generation at a time, without skipping any.
-
-
12th September 07, 12:59 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by gilmore
YThe first step in tracing your family's history is going to the oldest people in your family and asking them what they remember about their parents, grandparents, and other ancestors. Then one goes to the public records to verify and flesh out these stories, ALWAYS working backward one generation at a time, without skipping any.
And your evidence he did not follow this exact procedure is...?
Quit being so argumentative with those trying to learn their own family's history. Every time one of these posts shows up, you're pishing all over it and it has become more than tiresome.
-
-
12th September 07, 02:55 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by Mike1
And your evidence he did not follow this exact procedure is...?
Quit being so argumentative with those trying to learn their own family's history. Every time one of these posts shows up, you're pishing all over it and it has become more than tiresome.
I find Gilmore's posts on these forums to be cogent and well reasoned. There's a lot of myth out there that passes for history, which isn't to say that I don't enjoy the myth sometimes.
I just joined a clan society that lists my wife's family as a sept. Now my wife's family's name is a Gaelic trade name, and thanks to posts by Gilmore, and articles by Matt, and others I do so fully realizing that its unlikely that her ancestors were members of that clan. That doesn't matter to me all that much. As has been pointed out in the past, the clan system is in fact no more, and all the rest of this is something else.
Joining the clan society gives my family a place to hang their hat at the games, and a sense of belonging, and that's well worth the price of the dues. But a shared last name does not an ancestor make.
Best regards,
Jake
[B]Less talk, more monkey![/B]
-
-
12th September 07, 03:50 PM
#8
 Originally Posted by Mike1
And your evidence he did not follow this exact procedure is...?
Quit being so argumentative with those trying to learn their own family's history. Every time one of these posts shows up, you're pishing all over it and it has become more than tiresome.
I have no idea what procedures the poster followed.
I don't see how pointing out a few well-accepted facts is being argumentative.
It is a fact that many lists of clan septs are wildly inaccurate. It is a fact that tartan merchants use these lists to sell merchandise.
My problem is with the statement "if you are interested in your family history I would say the first step to a larger world would be to join your clan society," which is quite unrealistic. The standard and accepted practice of genealogical research is starting with one's immediate family and working backward, generation by generation. Trying to take short cuts almost always leads to trouble at some point in the future. (The one exception is the possibility of DNA testing's being helpful.)
Nor do I have problems with people joining clan societies. I once joined one myself. But face it, they are simply organizations for people who happen to bear the same surname, through accidents of birth and history.
I don't have problems with people making claims to their friends and others about their clans, their ancestry, their relatives, their right to wear certain tartans, etc, if it makes them feel good.
My problem is with these claims and methodologies being taken seriously, passed on to those of us doing serious genealogical work, and wasting our time.
If I wanted to be argumentative and puncture a few Brigadoonish fantasies, I would insist that the vast majority of Scots were Lowlanders descended from Anglo-Saxon-Jute Northumbrians who never spoke a word of Gaelic, were never part of the clan system, whose surnames were never associated with a clan, and looked down on the Highland clans as uncouth barbarians. But I wont.
-
-
12th September 07, 05:46 PM
#9
 Originally Posted by gilmore
My problem is with the statement "if you are interested in your family history I would say the first step to a larger world would be to join your clan society," which is quite unrealistic. The standard and accepted practice of genealogical research is starting with one's immediate family and working backward, generation by generation. Trying to take short cuts almost always leads to trouble at some point in the future. (The one exception is the possibility of DNA testing's being helpful.)
And you know if McMurdo has, in fact, started with his immediate family and worked backward, generation by generation, to discover his connection to the Grahams is quite real, then his statement would make a lot of sense. If the Clan Graham Society is, indeed, 'his clan society', then he has just uncovered an exciting new way to learn about his family.
Nor do I have problems with people joining clan societies. I once joined one myself. But face it, they are simply organizations for people who happen to bear the same surname, through accidents of birth and history.
No doubt joined on a drunken dare, eh?
For someone who is so insistent on careful research and study, you are certainly quick to group all clan societies under one umbrella. Although I would agree that most people are accidents of birth, although there will be those that were carefully planned out and conceived at just the precise moment specified.
My problem is with these claims and methodologies being taken seriously, passed on to those of us doing serious genealogical work, and wasting our time.
Ahhhh, so now I understand. You are a Graham descendant, yourself. And rather than asking how McMurdo came to his genealogical conclusions, you're just assuming he is wasting your time. Now I understand your motive. you're bound to lose years of research by taking the time to prove or disprove McMurdo's genealogy, aren't you?
If I wanted to be argumentative and puncture a few Brigadoonish fantasies, I would insist that the vast majority of Scots were Lowlanders descended from Anglo-Saxon-Jute Northumbrians who never spoke a word of Gaelic, were never part of the clan system, whose surnames were never associated with a clan, and looked down on the Highland clans as uncouth barbarians. But I wont.
That would not be argumentative, that would be historically accurate.
Spouting off about McMurdo's comments without having any proof or evidence of how extensively he has examined his own lineage? Now that was being argumentative. And you are finished being argumentative, aren't you? Begging your pardon, I just realized I phrased that as a question. Let me try again. You are finished being argumentative.
-
-
12th September 07, 06:06 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by Mike1
And you know if McMurdo has, in fact, started with his immediate family and worked backward, generation by generation, to discover his connection to the Grahams is quite real, then his statement would make a lot of sense. If the Clan Graham Society is, indeed, 'his clan society', then he has just uncovered an exciting new way to learn about his family....
No doubt joined on a drunken dare, eh?
For someone who is so insistent on careful research and study, you are certainly quick to group all clan societies under one umbrella. Although I would agree that most people are accidents of birth, although there will be those that were carefully planned out and conceived at just the precise moment specified.
Ahhhh, so now I understand. You are a Graham descendant, yourself. And rather than asking how McMurdo came to his genealogical conclusions, you're just assuming he is wasting your time. Now I understand your motive. you're bound to lose years of research by taking the time to prove or disprove McMurdo's genealogy, aren't you?
That would not be argumentative, that would be historically accurate.
Spouting off about McMurdo's comments without having any proof or evidence of how extensively he has examined his own lineage? Now that was being argumentative. And you are finished being argumentative, aren't you? Begging your pardon, I just realized I phrased that as a question. Let me try again. You are finished being argumentative.
I didn't join the clan society in question on a drunken dare. I joined it through relying on unsound, ficticious information that a relative was fond of proclaiming as truth.
I am not concerned with McMurdo wasting my time. In fact I am happy for him. I am, however, greatly concerned generally with those who pass on unsound methodology and the information gained through it as if it were reliable. You see, the pool of genealogical information is relied upon by many researchers. If it is polluted, bad info is passed on and on, and it takes longer and longer to clear up. I feel that those of us who do genealogy have a responsibility to other researchers and to our families to exercise prudence and use the best methodologies we can.
My point is simply as you quoted it above: "My problem is with the statement "if you are interested in your family history I would say the first step to a larger world would be to join your clan society," which is quite unrealistic. The standard and accepted practice of genealogical research is starting with one's immediate family and working backward, generation by generation. Trying to take short cuts almost always leads to trouble at some point in the future. (The one exception is the possibility of DNA testing's being helpful.)"
-
Similar Threads
-
By GMan in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 46
Last Post: 23rd May 08, 06:06 PM
-
By James MacMillan in forum Kilt Board Newbie
Replies: 30
Last Post: 6th August 07, 08:44 AM
-
By beloitpiper in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 18
Last Post: 25th May 07, 07:46 PM
-
By shane the piper in forum Kilt Board Newbie
Replies: 13
Last Post: 29th March 07, 12:25 AM
-
By GMan in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 1
Last Post: 10th June 05, 09:33 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks