Sporran quandary

[Nervous Jock]

"...besides, the Utilikilt is proudly American; why dress it up with a Scottish accessory, which it does not need? The same goes for the proposed sporran: Our Utilikilts have wonderous pockets - you simply do not need a sporran! I am sorry but, as I see it, adding these accessories gives me the impression that you are trying to tell people that, in spite of its looks, you are actually wearing a KILT!"

Probably a good point, all the advice you have been given not to wear a sporran has come from the Colonies

[Streetcar]

Probably a good point, all the advice you have been given not to wear a sporran has come from the Colonies

Actually, the advice came from our own Hamish... (West Sussex, United Kingdom)

[Nervous Jock]

Actually, the advice came from our own Hamish... (West Sussex, United Kingdom)

Fair enough , I just have a problem getting my head round pockets in kilts.

[ccga3359]

Fair enough , I just have a problem getting my head round pockets in kilts.

I do recommend pockets, just love 'em. I've been kilted since January of this year an the one thing I've missed were pant's pocket. Imagine the look of me kilted in a bar, groping for missing pockets. My FK has hidden front slash pockets and they are a fantastic. Only wish these pockets were availiable on the more traditional styled kilts!

[Panache]

Only wish these pockets were availiable on the more traditional styled kilts!

Steve makes them!

Cheers

Jamie

[ccga3359]

Probably a good point, all the advice you have been given not to wear a sporran has come from the Colonies

If the modern casual kilt is far enough removed from a "Scottish" kilt, could not the modern sporran be viewed as the same. I feel that the modern kilt and many of the accessories are an evolvement powered by necessity.