-
27th January 08, 08:11 AM
#21
 Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
Heraldically speaking, when you wear your chief's badge, you are showing your loyalty to the cheif. At the heart of it, this is what it means to be a member of the clan. Are you loyal to your clan cheif? Even if one could not prove through geneaology that they were related to the clan, if you were loyal to the cheif, you'd most likely be considered a member.
Even with those requirements, there's not really a Scottish clan I can claim. I do have some Scottish ancestors.
The only "clan" to which I have sworn loyalty is the US Army.
And as Steve said, I a member of this great internet clan.
We're fools whether we dance or not, so we might as well dance. - Japanese Proverb
-
-
27th January 08, 08:22 AM
#22
 Originally Posted by beloitpiper
Gilmore, clans aren't what they used to be, but they still exist, albeit in a different form.
I believe gilmore clarified himself, by correctly stating the clan system is now dead. Anyone can romantically cling to the idea that they are a member of a clan, but I think we need to remain on firm footing by understanding there is a tremendous difference between what it meant to be a member of a clan and being a member of a contemporary clan society.
Let's not split hairs on this thread, else it will be headed to the bin, same as similar threads before it.
-
-
27th January 08, 08:22 AM
#23
Dave, you can join any clan you wish, you don't have to be a so called 'sept' or of the name of that clan or any blood ties what so ever. If they accept you as a member of the Clan/Clan Society then you are a member.
That's how its been for generations don't be drawn into Skene's Victorian romanticism of 'septs' and/or being of the name or family.
To quote Sir Thomas Innes of Learney, GCVO WS (1893-1971) Lord Lyon King of Arms, 1945-1969, after being Carrick Pursuivant and Albany Herald in the 1930’s makes mention in the book Clan Septs and Regiments of the Scottish Highlands 1952 co-authored by Frank Adam that; “septs must be regarded as a rather wonderful effort of imagination” and “The very word ‘sept’ is delusive and no serious attention can now be attached to Skene’s theories about ‘septs”. He also states that some Clan historians could be being found guilty of “sept-snatching”.
"So sometimes sept families are related to the clan chief and his family, but, more likely, they would not be."
Last edited by Sketraw; 27th January 08 at 08:29 AM.
-
-
27th January 08, 08:50 AM
#24
 Originally Posted by Mike1
I believe gilmore clarified himself, by correctly stating the clan system is now dead. Anyone can romantically cling to the idea that they are a member of a clan, but I think we need to remain on firm footing by understanding there is a tremendous difference between what it meant to be a member of a clan and being a member of a contemporary clan society.
Let's not split hairs on this thread, else it will be headed to the bin, same as similar threads before it.
The Clan System (enfisis on the system) may well be dead but the 'Clan' has taken on a different remit to what it was before. It is one of a sense of belonging, kinship & friendship; participation of the like minded and a respect for ones ancestors & history good or bad. The Clan System as a form of self governing body perhaps might be dead but not the Clan.
-
-
27th January 08, 08:59 AM
#25
Is it your name, your ancestry, or a membership card that gives you bragging rights as a Clan MacX clansman?
I don't know about "bragging rights", but I do know I'm a Chisholm by surname, geneology, clan society association, and a DNA relationship to the original Norman chiefs. I agree that the relationship between the chief and his people doesn't exist as it once did, even though in the mid 19th century a large number of Canadian Chisholm's swore an oath of fealty to the new chief. I have found that a clan relationship does still exist among the extended family itself. As a young hippie in the late 1960's I traveled (hitch hiked) all over the US and Canada and always looked for fellow Chisholm's. I always found them friendly and helpful. Once, my mother was traveling alone in New Zealand and became stranded. She went to the phone book and called the first Chisholm she found, they gave her comradeship a place to stay until she could make arrangments to get home. So is the clan dead? Maybe, but "The Blood is Strong".
-
-
27th January 08, 09:54 AM
#26
I'm a Morrison by my mother's side, but I really don't think I need to prove it by having a card, but I can see why they do it though and that's not a problem.
-
-
27th January 08, 11:04 AM
#27
 Originally Posted by Sketraw
The Clan System (enfisis on the system) may well be dead but the 'Clan' has taken on a different remit to what it was before. It is one of a sense of belonging, kinship & friendship; participation of the like minded and a respect for ones ancestors & history good or bad. The Clan System as a form of self governing body perhaps might be dead but not the Clan.
Spot on.
-
-
27th January 08, 11:18 AM
#28
 Originally Posted by Zardoz
The Irish don't have clans, we have gangs! X-Marks is my only 'clan'.
My wife on the other hand, is related to the Lamont and Thomson clans on her father's side and Stuart and Burns on her mothers.
The Irish have Clans. I am a chieftain in the Clan Cian (read O'Carroll) But I also consider myself an Xmarker
-
-
27th January 08, 12:17 PM
#29
 Originally Posted by michael steinrok
The Irish have Clans. I am a chieftain in the Clan Cian (read O'Carroll) But I also consider myself an Xmarker
That's a bit of a sticky wicket, though...the Irish have modern clan societies, but the Irish do not have a clan system similar to the Scottish one.
The Irish genealogist Sean Murphy has an excellent series of articles dealing with the issue of Irish clans & chiefs on his web site:
http://homepage.eircom.net/%7Eseanjmurphy/chiefs/
Murphy was involved with outing the pretender Terrence MacCarthy back in the late '90s.
Regards,
Todd
-
-
27th January 08, 12:19 PM
#30
 Originally Posted by BoldHighlander
See my post above for Sean Murphy's series of articles on the issue of "Irish clans".
T.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Rufus in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 49
Last Post: 4th January 09, 08:12 PM
-
By Colquhoun in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 28
Last Post: 15th August 08, 03:59 AM
-
By morpth in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 21
Last Post: 28th January 07, 02:12 PM
-
By macsim in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 10
Last Post: 24th November 06, 08:58 AM
-
By Ranald in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 31
Last Post: 12th September 05, 12:55 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks