-
25th July 08, 01:47 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by JRB
As far as I'm concerned, once someone puts his hands on you in any way that seems threatening, a physical response is justified. It's sounds like you handled the situation quite well. Unfortunately, it also sounds to me like you may not have heard the last of that guy.
I'm in agreement with Jay here. This time he brought a friend to back him up. I'd be very careful the next time.
Cheers
Jamie
-See it there, a white plume
Over the battle - A diamond in the ash
Of the ultimate combustion-My panache
Edmond Rostand
-
-
25th July 08, 03:17 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by Panache
I'm in agreement with Jay here. This time he brought a friend to back him up. I'd be very careful the next time.
Cheers
Jamie
Agreed with Jay and Jamie,
Next time there may be no warning and three instead of two.
Clan Lamont!
-
-
25th July 08, 03:42 PM
#3
Being a former Hooiser (20+yrs ago) I understand the type. MOST Hoosiers are super down to earth people but a few have blinders on to anything different. Kilts would be definately different in Indiana. I know people who have not gone 50 miles away from home... ever.
-
-
25th July 08, 03:43 PM
#4
You responded appropriately. You stayed calm and in control, and you used just enough force to get the point across.
But I have to agree with the others... Watch out. That punk may come back with more friends, and there probably won't be any conversation or warning next time.
Good for you, good luck, and watch your back!
-
-
25th July 08, 03:52 PM
#5
Hector, I believe you responded appropriately.
This man broke two rules:
1) Never touch a stranger (who knows the training they have had)
2) The toes you step on today may be connected to the backside you have to kiss tomorrow (he may need you for something someday)
I also agree with others who have said to collect documentation - most pharmacies have video cameras - just in case there is a need for it in the future.
-
-
25th July 08, 10:50 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by Clockwork John
You responded appropriately. You stayed calm and in control, and you used just enough force to get the point across.
...
Where did you go to law school?
Sorry, but on the facts given, our friend could easily be found guilty of battery, if they were established in court.
Force can be used only to resist an attack on one's own or another's person. There must be impending peril of unlawful force without convenient or reasonable mode of escape, and there must be a reasonable belief of immediate danger.
According to the facts set out, there was no threat of immediate physical danger, nor was leaving the scene at all impossible.
Further, only as much force as is reasonably required may be lawfully used. E.g., the use of deadly force against non-deadly force does not constitute a defense of self defense. In other words I doubt that neither the mere tugging of a sporran belt ---having already been done---nor even the threat of one's sporran belt being tugged again (which was not in the facts given), would legally justify knocking some one to the ground.
Last edited by gilmore; 25th July 08 at 10:55 PM.
-
-
26th July 08, 12:00 AM
#7
 Originally Posted by gilmore
Where did you go to law school?
Sorry, but on the facts given, our friend could easily be found guilty of battery, if they were established in court.
Force can be used only to resist an attack on one's own or another's person. There must be impending peril of unlawful force without convenient or reasonable mode of escape, and there must be a reasonable belief of immediate danger.
According to the facts set out, there was no threat of immediate physical danger, nor was leaving the scene at all impossible.
Further, only as much force as is reasonably required may be lawfully used. E.g., the use of deadly force against non-deadly force does not constitute a defense of self defense. In other words I doubt that neither the mere tugging of a sporran belt ---having already been done---nor even the threat of one's sporran belt being tugged again (which was not in the facts given), would legally justify knocking some one to the ground.
Probably true. It's too bad this "misguided scrapper" can't just see the err of his ways. Maybe pour himself a bowl of Cheerios and find a nice spoonful of "open mind" in it. Or perhaps a slice of toast with a bite of "ego deflater" in it.
But on the other hand, there have been a couple of people that I have come across that I just couldn't really get along with till we had a little dust up. After that we became fairly good friends.
Last edited by Spc. Scott; 26th July 08 at 12:15 AM.
I have always tempered my killing with respect for the game pursued. I see the animal not only as a target but as a living creature with more freedom than I will ever have. I take that life if I can, with regret as well as joy, and with the sure knowledge that nature's ways of fang and claw or exposure and starvation are a far crueler fate than I bestow. - Fred Bear
-
Similar Threads
-
By celtic cowboy in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 14
Last Post: 14th July 08, 09:41 AM
-
By Riverkilt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 26
Last Post: 28th February 08, 08:13 PM
-
By Razbarry in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 9
Last Post: 4th October 07, 09:50 AM
-
By beloitpiper in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 12
Last Post: 5th June 07, 11:41 AM
-
By porrick in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 17
Last Post: 26th April 06, 10:32 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks