X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeolounger View Post
    I do not own, and refuse to buy, a full set of "black tie" garb. I would use such attire at most once every four or five years, and would have to manufacture reason to do that. I'm not likely to go to the trouble to rent formal wear, either--that level of formality is just too artificial for me. In short, if the invitation specifies "black tie," I won't be there. You need not worry about seeing me wearing a tartan tie over my tweed kilt at your precious black tie event.

    Remember, gents, that kilts were originally WORK clothing for rural folks, not formal wear. My grandmother taught us to "put your best money in your everyday shoes," meaning buy good quality on what you will wear often. Don't spend money on stuff you won't use.
    I've never understood the connotation that "rural" people somehow resent all manner of "proper" attire. I've heard this a lot here in SW Missouri, but if you look at photos from the late 19th century/early 20th century, people simply knew the levels of attire for certain functions. Robert Burns was a puir ploughman frae Ayr, but he also could socialise with the gentry, and benefited from it through patronage.

    My grandfather and great-grandfather, for example, were Iowa farmers, but both owned suits (not just one), French-cuff shirts and other kit. Sure, they wore overalls in the fields, but when it was time to go to church or lodge, they wore their best, as they respected those institutions.

    Yes, the kilt may have been "work" clothes at one time, but the kilt also could be "formal" attire as well -- the pedigree isn't really a good excuse for rejecting formal attire.

    I'm afraid this post is just as judgemental of those of us who take pride in our formal attire as the people who judge those who do not wear it.

    Regards,

    Todd

  2. #2
    Join Date
    14th March 06
    Posts
    1,873
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What is a prat?

    What is a chav?

    Should I be concerned?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    29th March 07
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    771
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gilmore View Post
    What is a prat?

    What is a chav?

    Should I be concerned?
    no, I love you crazy Americans

  4. #4
    Join Date
    16th December 08
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    268
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gilmore View Post
    What is a prat?

    What is a chav?

    Should I be concerned?
    "Prat" is what you are likely sitting on. No, not the chair, your backside.

    "Chav" is a derogatory term for child, although it can be applied to persons of almost any age. Rough equivalent to "trailer trash" without the trailer. Usually inclined to criminality, relatively uneducated and either in low paying jobs or unemployed.

    Both terms are British in origin, and likely unfamiliar to people who speak "American."

    No, I don't think you should be concerned. Someone is just venting. I am under the impression Chavs don't wear kilts much. Anyone from the right-hand side of the pond want to clarify?

    But, I know what they mean. I went to my son's High School Graduation. Some of the parents there seemed to have the concept that having a clean T-shirt on was dressing up! I saw mullets too! Weren't they banned by international treaty?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    17th July 08
    Location
    Fayetteville, NC
    Posts
    1,879
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just have to throw in my tuppence worth. As a card carrying member of the Benevolent Protective Order of Old Farts, I am inclined to bemoan the demise of what I call "good taste" in clothing. I am not referring here to style, but to how the style is worn. I have seen T-Shirts and Jeans worn where I would wear at least a Sport Coat and a tieless shirt, and the wearer was neatly dressed. The T-shirt was clean, had no "message" on it, the Jeans were ditto, and pressed.

    When I am working in my shop, I dress appropriately. When I go to a "Black Tie" dinner, I also dress appropriately. If I am mucking out a barn or stable, I dress appropriately. When I go into the "market" place, I do not wear the manure stained work clothes I wore in the barn.

    That is, I think, the basic message of all the previous posts. I'll climb down now.
    The pipes are calling, resistance is futile. - MacTalla Mor

  6. #6
    Join Date
    27th May 07
    Location
    Leona Valley, California
    Posts
    849
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Carolina Kiltman View Post
    Just have to throw in my tuppence worth. As a card carrying member of the Benevolent Protective Order of Old Farts, I am inclined to bemoan the demise of what I call "good taste" in clothing. I am not referring here to style, but to how the style is worn. I have seen T-Shirts and Jeans worn where I would wear at least a Sport Coat and a tieless shirt, and the wearer was neatly dressed. The T-shirt was clean, had no "message" on it, the Jeans were ditto, and pressed.

    When I am working in my shop, I dress appropriately. When I go to a "Black Tie" dinner, I also dress appropriately. If I am mucking out a barn or stable, I dress appropriately. When I go into the "market" place, I do not wear the manure stained work clothes I wore in the barn.

    That is, I think, the basic message of all the previous posts. I'll climb down now.
    I think you really captured both the substance and tone of what was meant by the OP, as well as many who agreed with him, and several who, superficially at least, disagreed with him.

    I may not be an "old fart"... I am, in fact, what you might call a "young upstart" or "whippersnapper" or something along those lines, but I agree completely.
    I may have grown up poor (hell, I'm still poor, or at best "Working Class"), but I always try to dress well, and I darn sure make sure I dress as appropriately as my means permit for every occasion.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    24th April 07
    Location
    Duluth, MN
    Posts
    506
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mind you....when Rex was hit by a cold blast of Duluth air, he completely forgot proper dress, and left his sporran in the hotel.



    (hee hee, I have no idea who this gent really is, but the resemblance is striking.)

    Kevin
    Last edited by kevinkinney; 7th January 09 at 10:11 PM.
    Institutio postulo novus informatio supersto
    Proudly monkeying with tradition since 1967.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    22nd July 08
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    2,878
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by xena View Post
    "Prat" is what you are likely sitting on. No, not the chair, your backside.

    "Chav" is a derogatory term for child, although it can be applied to persons of almost any age. Rough equivalent to "trailer trash" without the trailer. Usually inclined to criminality, relatively uneducated and either in low paying jobs or unemployed.

    Both terms are British in origin, and likely unfamiliar to people who speak "American."
    Well, thank goodness SOMEBODY cleared that up. I thought it was some kind of skin condition.

    As for speaking American, I've lived my entire life as an honest, humble Canadian, and I don't think I've ever seen or heard those terms until today. Funny, they didn't cover that vocabulary in college when I took English 101. Heh...

  9. #9
    bikeolounger's Avatar
    bikeolounger is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    2nd October 07
    Location
    bluegrass state (KY)
    Posts
    239
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunscot View Post
    I've never understood the connotation that "rural" people somehow resent all manner of "proper" attire. I've heard this a lot here in SW Missouri, but if you look at photos from the late 19th century/early 20th century, people simply knew the levels of attire for certain functions. Robert Burns was a puir ploughman frae Ayr, but he also could socialise with the gentry, and benefited from it through patronage.

    My grandfather and great-grandfather, for example, were Iowa farmers, but both owned suits (not just one), French-cuff shirts and other kit. Sure, they wore overalls in the fields, but when it was time to go to church or lodge, they wore their best, as they respected those institutions.

    Yes, the kilt may have been "work" clothes at one time, but the kilt also could be "formal" attire as well -- the pedigree isn't really a good excuse for rejecting formal attire.

    I'm afraid this post is just as judgemental of those of us who take pride in our formal attire as the people who judge those who do not wear it.

    Regards,

    Todd

    And you misread my intent. The apparent judgemental voice was to make a point--that too many who wear formal attire who look down their noses at those of us who cannot justify the expenses involved in wearing the stuff. In general, I simply find that because I don't "fit in" for such formal occasions, I just don't go.
    Lovin' the breeze 'tween m'knees!

  10. #10
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeolounger View Post
    And you misread my intent. The apparent judgemental voice was to make a point--that too many who wear formal attire who look down their noses at those of us who cannot justify the expenses involved in wearing the stuff. In general, I simply find that because I don't "fit in" for such formal occasions, I just don't go.
    But aren't you being just as judgemental and making assumptions that everyone who wears formal attire thinks you don't "fit in"?

    If you don't like formal attire, or can't justify purchasing it is one thing. I won't "look down my nose" at you over that -- but I do take exception at being judged as a snob just because I do wear formal attire.

    T.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. PC with a black four in one tie?
    By Rogerson785 in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2nd December 08, 09:17 PM
  2. Black on black on Black (kilt ninja style for wedding)
    By michael wilson in forum Kilt Advice
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 20th January 08, 02:37 PM
  3. Ghillies and coloured hose
    By ccga3359 in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 14th October 07, 02:03 PM
  4. Brown/Black Sporran with Brown and Black Accessories
    By Panache in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 23rd August 06, 01:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0