-
7th January 09, 11:42 AM
#1
Todd ,yet again , I think you read too much in a post:- nowhere does it say in bikelounger's post that rural folk resent all manner of proper attire... he simply said clothes should be appropriate for work!
You comment "I'm afraid this post is just as judgemental of those of us who take pride in our formal attire as the people who judge those who do not wear it." really doesn't follow, as he is not judging anyone else , merely saying that black tie isn't for him!
Please don't think I'm against your having your own opinions, but it's an observation that you feel that "proper attire"(your words) is being attacked ,and clearly in this post it wasn't, that poster obviously isn't one for the full black number, but he didn't say that other kilt wearer couldn't or shouldn't.
Last edited by Paul Henry; 7th January 09 at 11:45 AM.
Reason: clarification
-
-
7th January 09, 12:07 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by paulhenry
Todd ,yet again , I think you read too much in a post:- nowhere does it say in bikelounger's post that rural folk resent all manner of proper attire... he simply said clothes should be appropriate for work!
You comment "I'm afraid this post is just as judgemental of those of us who take pride in our formal attire as the people who judge those who do not wear it." really doesn't follow, as he is not judging anyone else, merely saying that black tie isn't for him!
Please don't think I'm against your having your own opinions, but it's an observation that you feel that "proper attire"(your words) is being attacked, and clearly in this post it wasn't, that poster obviously isn't one for the full black number, but he didn't say that other kilt wearer couldn't or shouldn't.
Thank you, PaulHenry, you got my point.
There is a vast difference between "too many" and "all." Some folks choose to not understand that distinction.
Lovin' the breeze 'tween m'knees!
-
-
7th January 09, 02:04 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by paulhenry
Todd ,yet again , I think you read too much in a post:- nowhere does it say in bikelounger's post that rural folk resent all manner of proper attire... he simply said clothes should be appropriate for work!
You comment "I'm afraid this post is just as judgemental of those of us who take pride in our formal attire as the people who judge those who do not wear it." really doesn't follow, as he is not judging anyone else , merely saying that black tie isn't for him!
Please don't think I'm against your having your own opinions, but it's an observation that you feel that "proper attire"(your words) is being attacked ,and clearly in this post it wasn't, that poster obviously isn't one for the full black number, but he didn't say that other kilt wearer couldn't or shouldn't.
Paul,
Regardless of the original intention of the poster (and his replies regarding my initial reply do clarify his meaning), you must admit that there is some "inverse snobbery" at Xmarks regarding traditionalists. That was my point.
In regards to work clothes, yes, the kilt originally was "field kit" -- but like those who say that kilts must evolve or die, why can't a kilt evolve from "field kit" to "formal wear"? Remember, a traditional kilt can be used for both.
Respectfully,
Todd
-
-
7th January 09, 02:26 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by cajunscot
Paul,
Regardless of the original intention of the poster (and his replies regarding my initial reply do clarify his meaning), you must admit that there is some "inverse snobbery" at Xmarks regarding traditionalists. That was my point.
In regards to work clothes, yes, the kilt originally was "field kit" -- but like those who say that kilts must evolve or die, why can't a kilt evolve from "field kit" to "formal wear"? Remember, a traditional kilt can be used for both.
Respectfully,
Todd
Todd, with all due respect: Yes, there are sentiments that can be construed as "inverse snobbery." There are also a TON of posts that show an even greater degree of kilt snobbery. That snobbery is what prompted my "over the top" post in the first place--the notion that one must own a traditional kilt to be able to say one owns a kilt (I am not willing to subject a $400+ garment to my lifestyle, and my lifestyle does not include full-on formal stuff).
Sure, I'd like to own a well-made semi-formal kilt in the tartan associated with my surname, in something other than a SportKilt, for wear on the rare occasion where a tie of any sort is appropriate. I've seen guys who (so my girlfriend tells me) look exceptionally dashing in their finery. Heck my girlfriend would probably tell you I would look as dashing if not more so (not that she's biased or anything). I don't begrudge anyone their ability to justify formal wear. It just isn't my scene.
It is good to read that you have figured out my point. I'll let it be a testament to my bad mood of the day (unrelated to anything on xmarks) that I didn't make it clear in the first place.
Lovin' the breeze 'tween m'knees!
-
Similar Threads
-
By Rogerson785 in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 11
Last Post: 2nd December 08, 09:17 PM
-
By michael wilson in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 52
Last Post: 20th January 08, 02:37 PM
-
By ccga3359 in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 3
Last Post: 14th October 07, 02:03 PM
-
By Panache in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 10
Last Post: 23rd August 06, 01:52 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks